Material Specification for Y:123; [Y(Pr)-Ba-Cu-O]
Process: Solid State Reaction
Notes: "All samples... were synthesized by the solid-state reaction of the appropriate amounts of Y2O3 (99.99%, Ventron), Pr2O3 (99.9%, Pechiney-St. Gobain), BaCO3 (99.5%, Carlo Erba RPE-ACS), and CuO (99.999%, Ventron). A mixture of fine powders of the starting materials was first fired as a pellet in air of 850 °C for 12 h, followed by slow cooling in the furnace. Then this pellet was again milled in an agate vial and repressed as a pellet with 12 mm diameter and... 1 mm thickness at (0.8 GPa = 8 kbar) and reheated at 850 °C during 12 h in air. Finally, the samples were submitted to a heat treatment under pure oxygen atmosphere, 16 h at 600 °C, and then cooled at a rate of 30 °C/h."
Formula: Y1-xPrxBa2Cu3O7-y
Informal Name: Y:123
Chemical Family: Y(Pr)-Ba-Cu-O
Chemical Class: Oxide
Structure Type: Polycrystalline
Manufacturer: In House
Commercial Name: In House
Production Date:
Lot Number:
Production Form:
Critical Temperature for Y:123; [Y(Pr)-Ba-Cu-O]
x of Prx (formula units) |
T(90%) (K) |
T(10%) (K) |
Critical Temperature (K) |
0.0 |
94.4 |
92.9 |
92.6 |
0.1 |
90.8 |
89.0 |
88.6 |
0.2 |
79.6 |
77.2 |
76.4 |
0.3 |
68.0 |
61.9 |
60.5 |
0.4 |
57.2 |
46.0 |
44.0 |
0.5 |
38.0 |
29.2 |
28.7 |
Measurement Method: Four-probe method
"Resistivity measurements were performed in bar-shaped samples approximately 5x1.5x1.5 mm
3 cut from the pellets, by a standard four-probe technique, using a lock-in amplifier (EG&G/PAR 5301) at a low frequency (27 Hz). Four in-line silver electrodes were evaporated onto the sample, and silver wires were glued to them with platinum paint (Demetron 308A). The current density was approximately 10
2 mA/cm
2 and the resolution of the voltage measurements was 10
-8 V."
Cautions: Evaluated Data
Resistivity (normal state) for Y:123; [Y(Pr)-Ba-Cu-O]
x of Prx (formula units) |
Temperature (K) |
Resistivity (normal state) (mΩ·cm) |
0.0 |
93 |
0.11 |
0.0 |
94 |
0.47 |
0.0 |
103 |
0.59 |
0.0 |
143 |
0.74 |
0.0 |
215 |
0.94 |
0.0 |
298 |
1.14 |
0.2 |
77 |
0.16 |
0.2 |
80 |
0.61 |
0.2 |
96 |
0.80 |
0.2 |
172 |
1.11 |
0.2 |
223 |
1.28 |
0.2 |
299 |
1.49 |
0.3 |
62 |
0.13 |
0.3 |
65 |
0.51 |
0.3 |
68 |
1.12 |
0.3 |
79 |
1.40 |
0.3 |
155 |
1.71 |
0.3 |
298 |
2.02 |
0.5 |
29 |
0.11 |
0.5 |
33 |
1.27 |
0.5 |
37 |
2.24 |
0.5 |
53 |
2.25 |
0.5 |
122 |
2.20 |
0.5 |
298 |
2.62 |
0.6 |
20 |
39.9 |
0.6 |
55 |
17.6 |
0.6 |
100 |
12.0 |
0.6 |
160 |
9.8 |
0.6 |
229 |
8.0 |
0.6 |
280 |
7.1 |
Measurement Method: Four-probe method
"Resistivity measurements were performed in bar-shaped samples approximately 5x1.5x1.5 mm
3 cut from the pellets, by a standard four-probe technique, using a lock-in amplifier (EG&G/PAR 5301) at a low frequency (27 Hz). Four in-line silver electrodes were evaporated onto the sample, and silver wires were glued to them with platinum paint (Demetron 308A). The current density was approximately 10
2 mA/cm
2 and the resolution of the voltage measurements was 10
-8 V."
Cautions: Evaluated Data
Digitized data were obtained from Figure 1 of the paper.
Thermoelectric Power for Y:123; [Y(Pr)-Ba-Cu-O]
x of Prx (formula units) |
Temperature (K) |
Thermoelectric Power (µV/K) |
0.00 |
81 |
0.1 |
0.00 |
90 |
0.0 |
0.00 |
96 |
0.7 |
0.00 |
100 |
0.7 |
0.00 |
101 |
0.5 |
0.00 |
122 |
0.3 |
0.00 |
158 |
0.5 |
0.00 |
199 |
0.9 |
0.00 |
245 |
1.3 |
0.00 |
282 |
1.4 |
0.10 |
79 |
0.0 |
0.10 |
87 |
0.5 |
0.10 |
87 |
1.1 |
0.10 |
92 |
1.4 |
0.10 |
89 |
3.2 |
0.10 |
93 |
3.5 |
0.10 |
93 |
4.1 |
0.10 |
90 |
5.3 |
0.10 |
90 |
6.9 |
0.10 |
95 |
7.1 |
0.10 |
128 |
5.0 |
0.10 |
144 |
4.0 |
0.10 |
192 |
2.7 |
0.10 |
234 |
2.4 |
0.10 |
260 |
2.2 |
0.10 |
267 |
2.2 |
0.10 |
297 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
20 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
28 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
41 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
57 |
14.1 |
0.4 |
82 |
20.1 |
0.4 |
122 |
21.7 |
0.4 |
170 |
20.1 |
0.4 |
216 |
18.4 |
0.4 |
271 |
15.9 |
0.4 |
295 |
15.3 |
0.5 |
20 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
24 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
28 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
30 |
2.7 |
0.5 |
34 |
16.9 |
0.5 |
50 |
22.6 |
0.5 |
69 |
24.5 |
0.5 |
65 |
25.3 |
0.5 |
95 |
28.6 |
0.5 |
109 |
29.4 |
0.5 |
146 |
27.2 |
0.5 |
176 |
26.3 |
0.5 |
187 |
26.3 |
0.5 |
196 |
24.7 |
0.5 |
207 |
24.7 |
0.5 |
218 |
23.6 |
0.5 |
233 |
22.8 |
0.5 |
245 |
21.9 |
0.5 |
262 |
21.1 |
0.5 |
275 |
20.5 |
0.6 |
11 |
14.2 |
0.6 |
25 |
24.8 |
0.6 |
23 |
28.4 |
0.6 |
32 |
30.7 |
0.6 |
83 |
49.5 |
0.6 |
139 |
59.8 |
0.6 |
200 |
57.0 |
0.6 |
243 |
49.6 |
0.6 |
291 |
41.0 |
Measurement Method: Thermopower measurement
The authors cite P.M. Chaikin et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 46, 218 (1975), and summarize the procedure as follows. "Thermoelectric power was measured by a slow ac (...0.01 Hz) technique....The small elongated samples approximately 4x1x0.5 mm
3, with evaporated silver contacts at the ends, were mounted with platinum paint between two 25 µm, high-purity gold foils (99.99% Goodfellow Metals) connected to two thermal reservoirs of quartz inside a vacuum chamber. The temperature gradients used were always smaller than 2 K and were measured using either gold-0.7 at.% Fe versus Chromel or copper versus Constantan thermocouples, depending on the temperature range. The experimental conditions used enabled us to have measurements with a resolution better than 0.1% or 0.1 µV/K
-1, whichever is the greater. Absolute thermoelectric power was calculated after correction for the absolute thermoelectric power of the gold leads..."
Cautions: Evaluated Data
Digitized data were obtained from Figure 2 of the paper.