Material Specification for Bi:2212; [Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O]
Process: Crystal Growth
Notes: The authors cite J.M. Imer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 62, 336 (1989), and summarize the procedure as follows. "The crystals were cleaved into thin ab-plane sheets of typical dimensions 2 x 1 x 0.01 mm3. The oxygen configuration of the crystals was altered by annealing in either oxygen (samples A and B) or a vacuum (samples C and D), using the same procedure employed in (M.F. Crommie et al., Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 41, 2526 (1990) )."
Formula: Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8-x
Informal Name: Bi:2212
Chemical Family: Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O
Chemical Class: Oxide
Structure Type: Single Crystal
Manufacturer: In House
Commercial Name: In House
Production Date:
Lot Number:
Production Form:
Resistivity (normal state) for Bi:2212; [Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O]
Sample Number () |
Temperature (K) |
Resistivity (normal state) (mΩ·cm) |
A |
82 |
0.04 |
A |
82 |
0.08 |
A |
86 |
0.11 |
A |
92 |
0.13 |
A |
145 |
0.19 |
A |
199 |
0.25 |
A |
234 |
0.30 |
A |
262 |
0.32 |
A |
295 |
0.37 |
B |
82 |
0.04 |
B |
84 |
0.08 |
B |
84 |
0.13 |
B |
88 |
0.16 |
B |
131 |
0.20 |
B |
182 |
0.25 |
B |
227 |
0.30 |
B |
258 |
0.33 |
B |
295 |
0.37 |
C |
12 |
1.1 |
C |
30 |
0.8 |
C |
38 |
1.0 |
C |
44 |
2.4 |
C |
50 |
5.9 |
C |
50 |
6.9 |
C |
74 |
5.2 |
C |
95 |
4.2 |
C |
119 |
3.7 |
C |
166 |
3.7 |
C |
226 |
4.0 |
C |
297 |
4.4 |
C |
299 |
4.4 |
D |
26 |
0.0 |
D |
36 |
1.6 |
D |
44 |
3.9 |
D |
52 |
5.0 |
D |
62 |
5.4 |
D |
95 |
4.4 |
D |
123 |
3.9 |
D |
168 |
3.2 |
D |
218 |
2.9 |
D |
290 |
2.7 |
D |
295 |
2.7 |
Measurement Method: Electrical resistance
"The measurements were performed along the ab plane..." No additional measurement details were noted.
Cautions: Unevaluated Data
Digitized data were obtained from Figure 1b and 2b of the paper.
Thermal Conductivity for Bi:2212; [Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O]
Sample Number () |
Temperature (K) |
Thermal Conductivity (W m-1 K-1) |
A |
23 |
3.6 |
A |
29 |
3.7 |
A |
31 |
4.0 |
A |
39 |
4.2 |
A |
60 |
4.8 |
A |
89 |
4.2 |
A |
137 |
4.5 |
A |
208 |
4.8 |
A |
218 |
5.0 |
A |
225 |
5.0 |
A |
235 |
5.2 |
A |
247 |
5.1 |
A |
252 |
5.2 |
A |
264 |
5.2 |
A |
281 |
5.6 |
A |
293 |
5.5 |
A |
297 |
5.9 |
A |
299 |
5.9 |
B |
25 |
4.9 |
B |
45 |
5.8 |
B |
49 |
6.0 |
B |
53 |
6.1 |
B |
60 |
6.4 |
B |
74 |
5.9 |
B |
87 |
5.4 |
B |
122 |
5.6 |
B |
158 |
5.7 |
B |
168 |
5.9 |
B |
176 |
5.9 |
B |
201 |
5.9 |
B |
256 |
6.3 |
B |
268 |
6.3 |
B |
295 |
6.7 |
C |
26 |
0.8 |
C |
60 |
1.2 |
C |
83 |
1.3 |
C |
142 |
1.6 |
C |
197 |
2.0 |
C |
205 |
2.0 |
C |
215 |
2.1 |
C |
270 |
2.5 |
C |
300 |
2.9 |
D |
32 |
1.5 |
D |
74 |
2.0 |
D |
143 |
2.6 |
D |
214 |
3.1 |
D |
271 |
3.5 |
D |
298 |
3.8 |
Measurement Method: Steady-state method
"The thermal conductivity was measured using a steady-state comparative technique, where a constantan wire attached in series with the sample served as a calibrated heat link. Since the thermal conductivity of the constantan enters the analysis, we determined, using an independent Joule heating method, the absolute (temperature-dependent) thermal conductivity of the constantan... Average temperature gradients across the sample were 0.5 K, and error due to radiation and heat leaks through the wires was estimated to be only a few percent... The measurements were performed along the ab plane..."
Cautions: Evaluated Data
Digitized data were obtained from Figure 1a and 2a of the paper.