NIST Standard Reference Database 30
Last Update to Data Content: 2002
"Test Metodology for Tubular Components," J.C. Conway, J.J. Mecholsky, and S.M. Wiederhorn, Projects Within the Center for Advanced Materials, pp. 201-276 (1990), edited by J.R. Hellmann and B.K. Kennedy, published by Center for Advanced Materials, Pennsylvania State University.Language: English
Commercially available silicon carbide materials were used in this study.
The authors cite D.L. Shelleman, "Test Methodology for Tubular Ceramics (Fast Fracture Strength Study)", Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, May 1991, and summarize the procedure as follows. Rings were cut from tubes 0.381±0.013 mm oversized using a 220-grit cut-off wheel. The sides of the rings were subsequently ground using a 220-grit wheel to within 0.076-0.127 mm of final dimensions. Material removal rate was less than or equal to 0.013 mm per pass. The sides of the rings were then lapped to final dimension using 15 µm sized media. Both inner and outer surface of the rings remained in the as-received condition. Final O-ring dimensions were: 43.8±0.4 mm O.D. x 34.2±0.3 mm I.D. x 9.5 mm for SCRB210; and 44.4±0.9 mm O.D. x 34.9±0.7 mm I.D. x 9.5 mm for Hexoloy SA. Final C-ring dimensions were: 44.4±0.9 mm O.D. x 34.9±0.7 mm I.D. x 9.5 mm wide for Hexoloy SA. A 1.6 mm stripe of alumina felt was placed between the ring specimen and the alumina loading rams. A 2.27 kg pre-load was applied to the specimen to maintain alignment. For room temperature testing, the rings were then loaded to failure at a crosshead rate of 0.508 mm/min. For elevated temperature testing, a computer was interfaced with the Instron testing machine and programmed to maintain the preload during transient heating to the test temperature. This compensated for thermal expansion of the specimen and loading train. Once the test temperature was reached the load was increased to 4.54 kg and held for 15 min. to allow the specimen to thermally equilibrate. Then specimens were loaded to failure using a crosshead rate of 0.508 mm/min.
| Amount of Element ( formula units ) |
Element ( no unit ) |
|---|---|
| 1 | Si |
| 1 | C |
| Temperature ( °C ) |
Test Type |
Compressive Strength ( GPa ) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | O-ring | 265 ± 24 |
| 800 | O-ring | 277 ± 28 |
| 1000 | O-ring | 305 ± 20 |
| 1200 | O-ring | 321 ± 20 |
| 1300 | O-ring | 325 ± 24 |
| Temperature ( °C ) |
Test Type |
Weibull Modulus ( no unit ) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | O-ring | 5.5 |
| 800 | O-ring | 4.8 |
| 1000 | O-ring | 7.6 |
| 1200 | O-ring | 7.3 |
| 1300 | O-ring | 7.2 |
| Amount of Element ( formula units ) |
Element ( no unit ) |
|---|---|
| 1 | Si |
| 1 | C |
| Temperature ( °C ) |
Test Type |
Compressive Strength ( GPa ) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | O-ring | 294 ± 16 |
| 1200 | O-ring | 302 |
| 1300 | O-ring | 300 |
| 1400 | O-ring | 300 |
| 25 | C-ring | 241 ± 10 |
| 1200 | C-ring | 261 ± 14 |
| 1300 | C-ring | 268 ± 20 |
| 1400 | C-ring | 290 ± 14 |
| 1400 | C-ring | 290±14 |
| Temperature ( °C ) |
Test Type |
Weibull Modulus ( no unit ) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | O-ring | 12.5 |
| 1200 | O-ring | 13.3 |
| 1300 | O-ring | 10.3 |
| 1400 | O-ring | 12.6 |
| 25 | C-ring | 15.2 |
| 1200 | C-ring | 10.1 |
| 1300 | C-ring | 6.9 |
| 1400 | C-ring | 12.9 |