NIST Structural Ceramics Database (SCD) Database

NIST Standard Reference Database 30

Last Update to Data Content: 2002

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18434/T4F30D


SCD Citation Number: Z00589

Bibliographic Information

Reference:
"Structure-Property Correlations for TiB2-Based Ceramics Densified Using Active Liquid Metals," V.J. Tennery, C.B. Finch, C.S. Yust, and G.W. Clark, Science of Hard Materials, pp. 891-909 (1983), edited by R.K. Viswanadham, D.J. Rowcliffe, and J. Gurland, published by Plenum Press.
Language: English

General Materials Processing Notes

"Commercially available TiB2 powders produced by grinding the product of carbothermic reaction between TiO2, C, and B4C (or B2O3) were selected as the bases for this work. ... In general, the average particle size varied between 5 µm and 15 µm, while the oxygen content varied between 0.5 and 2 wt%. ... a set of hot pressing conditions was selected in which only the time at hot pressing temperature was the variable. ... Dry TiB2 and Ni powders were weighed to ±0.05 g and mixed 24 h by tumbling in polyethylene jars. The powder mixtures were loaded into 4.5 cm or 6.0 cm ID graphite die assemblies. The cylindrical surfaces and punch faces of the dies were lined with 0.25 mm thick grafoil or a 0.1 mm thick coating of BN. ... The disks were pressed singly in a vacuum hot press assembly consisting of a vertical graphite resistance heating element furnace surrounding the press assembly. The system was loaded with the dies and evacuated to 10-3 Pa. The furnace was heated to 1000 °C and held at this temperature until outgassing was complete and the pressure reached 10-3 Pa. The temperature was then increased to a final hot pressing temperature of 1425 °C. ... Recovery of the pressure to about 10-3 Pa was usually achieved within 1.0 ks to 1.5 ks... At this time, loading was applied to the die punches via the press rams at a rate of about 3.5 kPa/s until the total pressure was 12 MPa. The charges were maintained under pressure for times ranging from 7.2 ks to 28.8 ks... Specimens of the required geometry and dimensions were cut from the as-pressed disks by electron discharge machining (EDM) or by an oil and water lubricated diamond saw. ... Following EDM cutting, the thin oxidation layer produced on the surface by the cutting was removed with diamond grinding wheels of grit sizes from 60 µm to 6 µm. Final polishing of critical surfaces of some specimens was performed using 0.5 µm diamond on a nylon lap in a vibratory polisher, followed by vibratory polishing with 0.3 µm Al2O3."

Measurement Methods

Density method
"The densities... were determined by immersion in H2O and by direct measurement determination of geometric density. The densities generally agreed within ±0.02 g/cm3."
Toughness test
"Fracture toughness was determined by the crack-indent method and by calculation from the measured fracture energies of double cantilever beam specimens and measured values of the elastic moduli and Poisson's ratios."
Laser flash technique
The authors cite F.F. Lange et al., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 59, 454-458 (1976), and summarize the procedure as follows. "Thermal transport in these ceramics was determined between 25 °C and 1200 °C using the laser flash technique. One side of a thin square plate specimen was flashed with a 50 J Nd-glass laser, and the temperature behavior of the opposite side was sensed with a liquid N2 cooled infrared detector. Analysis of the thermal transient led to calculation of the thermal diffusivity."
Ultrasonic method
The authors cite W. Mason, Acoustic Properties of Solids, Section IIIF-1, Amer. Inst. of Physics Handbook, pp. 74-79 (1957), and summarize the procedure as follows. "Values of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were determined from ultrasonic data on these ceramics..." No additional measurement details were noted.
Four-point bend test
"... fracture strength was determined at 25 °C using four-point flexure of bars having an outer span of 3.8 cm and an inner span of 1.85 cm." No additional measurement details were noted.
Hardness test
The authors cite G.R. Gessel, "Effect of Minor Alloys on the Strength and Swelling Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel," ORNL/TM-6359, pp. 72-75 (1979), and summarize the procedure as follows. "The diamond pyramid hardness (DPH) was determined in vacuum (10-3 Pa) between room temperature and 800 °C using a diamond indenter and the procedure of Gessel. The polished specimen surfaces typically showed no evidence of oxidation following indentation at high temperature."

Index of Materials and Properties

Material Number 1: TiB2

Material Specification and Properties for TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Chemical Class: Boride
Chemical Family: Ti-B
Formula: TiB2
Informal Name: titanium diboride
Structure Type: Polycrystalline
Manufacturer: In-House
Process: Hot Pressing

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Density (mass)
Powder
Code
 
Mass Fraction
of Ni
( % )
Hot Pressing
Time
( ks )
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
B 0.0 --- 12 4.46
B 0.0 --- 25 4.43
D 3.0 7.2 --- 4.62
C --- 7.2 --- 4.56
B 0.91 7.2 8 4.52
B 0.39 14.4 8 4.50
B 0.25 28.8 8 4.56
--- 0.43 --- 8 4.56

Measurement Method: Density method
Evaluation Status: Evaluated by acceptance criteria

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Elastic Modulus
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
Elastic
Modulus
( GPa )
12 4.46 563
25 4.43 503
--- 4.62 514
8 4.52 569
8 4.50 568
8 4.56 574

Measurement Method: Ultrasonic method
Evaluation Status: Unevaluated

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Flexural Strength
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
Flexural
Strength
( MPa )
--- 4.62 386 ± 65
--- 4.56 448 ± 28
8 4.52 731 ± 21
8 4.50 703 ± 66
8 4.56 756 ± 42

Measurement Method: Four-point bend test
Evaluation Status: Unevaluated

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Fracture Energy
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
Fracture
Energy
( J m-2 )
--- 4.62 30
8 4.52 30
8 4.50 40
8 4.56 40

Measurement Method: Toughness test
Evaluation Status: Evaluated by acceptance criteria

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Fracture Toughness
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
Fracture
Toughness
( MPa m1/2 )
--- 4.62 5.6
--- 4.56 7.8
8 4.52 5.8
8 4.50 6.7
8 4.56 6.7

Measurement Method: Toughness test
Evaluation Status: Evaluated by acceptance criteria

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Hardness
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
Temperature
 
( °C )
Hardness
 
( GPa )
12 4.46 27 23
12 4.46 152 18
12 4.46 152 16
12 4.46 200 14
12 4.46 247 14
12 4.46 248 14
12 4.46 300 12
12 4.46 300 11
12 4.46 353 11
12 4.46 401 10
12 4.46 401 9.8
12 4.46 449 9.6
12 4.46 449 8.9
12 4.46 502 9.1
12 4.46 502 8.8
12 4.46 550 9.8
12 4.46 550 9.4
12 4.46 650 9.0
12 4.46 650 8.4
12 4.46 703 7.1
12 4.46 703 7.4
12 4.46 756 5.8
12 4.46 799 4.4
12 4.46 799 4.2
8 4.56 22 24
8 4.56 22 22
8 4.56 152 18
8 4.56 152 16
8 4.56 195 17
8 4.56 199 16
8 4.56 247 15
8 4.56 247 15
8 4.56 295 13
8 4.56 295 12
8 4.56 343 11
8 4.56 348 12
8 4.56 396 11
8 4.56 401 11
8 4.56 449 10
8 4.56 454 11
8 4.56 502 9.8
8 4.56 502 10.4
8 4.56 554 10.0
8 4.56 550 9.2
8 4.56 593 9.4
8 4.56 597 9.0
8 4.56 650 8.2
8 4.56 650 7.5
8 4.56 698 7.4
8 4.56 703 7.7
8 4.56 756 6.8
8 4.56 756 6.5
8 4.56 799 6.5
8 4.56 799 6.2
Measurement Method: Hardness test
Evaluation Status: Evaluated by acceptance criteria
Cautions:
Indenter load = 5.65 N. Data were digitized from Fig. 8 of the reference.

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Poisson's Ratio
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
Poisson's
Ratio
( no unit )
--- 4.62 0.122
8 4.52 0.113
8 4.50 0.128
8 4.56 0.112

Measurement Method: Ultrasonic method
Evaluation Status: Unevaluated

TiB2

Material number 1 of 1
in SCD Citation Number: Z00589
Thermal Diffusivity
Grain
Size
( µm )
Density
 
( g cm-3 )
Temperature
 
( °C )
Thermal
Diffusivity
( cm2 s-1 )
12 4.46 23 0.339
12 4.46 311 0.198
12 4.46 404 0.173
12 4.46 502 0.169
12 4.46 608 0.162
12 4.46 714 0.157
12 4.46 797 0.156
12 4.46 903 0.154
12 4.46 1001 0.151
12 4.46 1100 0.148
8 4.56 23 0.329
8 4.56 304 0.195
8 4.56 403 0.177
8 4.56 502 0.168
8 4.56 609 0.153
8 4.56 692 0.157
8 4.56 797 0.154
8 4.56 903 0.151
8 4.56 1002 0.147
8 4.56 1107 0.146
8 4.56 1198 0.146

Measurement Method: Laser flash technique
Evaluation Status: Evaluated by acceptance criteria
Cautions:
Data were digitized from Fig. 9 of the reference.