IUPAC-NIST Solubility Database
NIST Standard Reference Database 106


Glass Ball as Bullet Solubility System: 1,1-Dichloroethane with Water.

Components:
   (1) 1,1-Dichloroethane; C2H4Cl2; [75-34-3]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
   (2) Water; H2O; [7732-18-5]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail

Evaluator:
   A. L. Horvath, Imperial Chemical Industries Limited, Runcorn, U.K.

Critical Evaluation:

   
     Part 2. The solubility of water (2) in 1,1,-dichloroethane (1) has been reported in three works only. The agreement is quite good in general, however, some discrepancy is apparent at 20oC between the investigators at the same laboratory.9,12 The combined data of Staverman,16 Newsham,9 and Barr and Newsham12 were used for the smoothing equation:

log10 x2 =  1.2719 – 1049.07/(T/K).

This equation represents the combined data with a standard deviation of 4.13 × 10–2 in the temperature range from 273 to 323 K. The recommended solubility values at 5 K intervals for water (2) in 1,1-dichloro-ethane (1) are presented in Table 2.
     Measured values and the curve obtained from the smoothing equation for solubility expressed as log10 x2 versus the reciprocal of absolute temperature are shown in Fig. 20. The figure illustrates the linear relation between the solubility expressed as log10x2 versus 1/T(K). Such straight line plots are characteristic for water solubility in halogenated hydrocarbons. The reader should consult the Preface for further details.
     The 1,1-dichloroethane (1) and water (2) binary system is treated in two parts; part 1 is 1,1-dichloroethane (1) in water (2) and part 2 is water (2) in 1,1-dichloroethane (1).
     Part 1. The solubility of 1,1-dichloroethane (1) in water (2) has been studied by 15 groups of investigators in the temperature interval from 273 to 323 K with resonably good agreement. However, some reported measurements have been rejected. The datum of Ley et al.1 is significantly lower than all other measurements and is therefore rejected. The solubility values of Howe et al.2 are several per cent higher than those calculated from the smoothing equation and are also rejected.
     The remaining data of Rex,3 Gross,4 Wright and Schaffer,5 van Arkel and Vles,6 Walraevens et al., 7 Sato and Nakijima, 8 Newsham,9 McNally and Grob,10,11 Barr and Newsham, 12 Gossett,13 Warner et al.,14 and Wright et al.15 were used to obtain the following mass percent (1) equation:

Solubility [100 w1] = 9.4136 - 5.7249 x 10-2 (T/K) + 9.17839 x 10-5 (T/K)2,

which shows a standard deviation of 3.70 x 10-2 in the temperature range from 273 to 323 K.
     The measurements and the curve obtained from the smoothing equation are shown in Fig. 19. A solubility minimum calculated from the above regression equation is 0.487 [100 w1] at 377.87 K. Additional details concerning the solubility minimum for aqueous hydrocarbon systems are discussed in the Preface.
     The recommended solubility values at 5 K intervals for 1,1-dichloroethane (1) in water (2) are presented in Table 1.



Experimental Data:   (Notes on the Nomenclature)

Table 1. Recommended solubility of 1,1,1-dichloroethane (1) in water (2)
t/°CT/K102 * Mass Fraction w1103 * Mole Fraction x1
0273.15_0.6241.142
5278.150.5911.081
10283.150.5621.028
15288.150.5380.984
20293.150.5190.949
25298.150.5040.921
30303.150.4930.901
35308.150.4880.892
40313.150.4870.890
45318.150.4900.896
50323.150.4980.910
Table 2. Recommended solubility of water (2) in 1,1-dichloroethane (1)
t/°CT/K102 * Mass Fraction w2103 * Mole Fraction x2
0273.150.04932.70
5278.150.05773.16
10283.150.06743.69
15288.150.07824.28
20293.150.09034.94
25298.150.10305.67
30303.150.11846.47
35308.150.13507.37
40313.150.15328.36
45318.150.17309.43
50323.150.194710.60
View Figure 1 for this Evaluation

View Figure 2 for this Evaluation

References: (Click a link to see its experimental data associated with the reference)

   1  Ley, G.J.M.; Hummel, D.O.; Schneider, C., Adv. in Chem. Ser. No. 66, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C., p. 184-202 (1967).
   2  Howe, G.B.; Mullins, M.E.; Rogers, T.N., AFESC Tyndall Air Force Base, Report ESL-TR-86-66, Vol. 1, Florida, Sept. 1987, 86 pp. (AD-A188 571).
   3  Rex, A., Z. Phys. Chem. 1906, 55, 355-70.
   4  Gross, P.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1929, 51, 2362-6.
   5  Wright, W.H.; Schaffer, J.M., Am. J. Hygiene 16, 325 (1932).
   6  van Arkel, A.E.; Vles, S.E., Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1936, 55, 407-11.
   7  Walraevens, R.; Trouillet, P.; Devos, A., Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 6, 777-86 (1974)
   8  Sato, A.; Nakijima, T., Arch. Envir. Health 1979, 34, 69-75.
   9  Newsham, D.M.T., Measurement and Correlation of Thermodynamic Data for Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, UMIST, Manchester (January. 1981).
   10  McNally, M.E.; Grob, R.L., J. Chromatogr. 1983, 260, 23-32.
   11  McNally, M.E.; Grob, R.L., J. Chromatogr. 1984, 284, 105-16.
   12  Barr, R.S.; Newsham, D.M.T., Fluid Phase Equilibr. 1987, 35, 189-205.
   13  Gossett, J.M., Environ. Sci. Technol. 1987, 21, 202-8.
   14  Warner, H.P.; Cohen, J.M.; Ireland, J.C., Determination of Henry's Law Constants of Selected Priority Pollutants, U. S. EPA Technical Report, PB87-212684, Cincinnati, OH., July 1987.
   15  Wright, D.A.; Sandler, S.I.; DeVoll, D., Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 1828-31.
   16  Staverman, A.J., Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1941, 60, 836-41.