IUPAC-NIST Solubility Database
NIST Standard Reference Database 106


Glass Ball as Bullet Solubility System: 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane with Water

Components:
   (1) Water; H2O; [7732-18-5]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
   (2) 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane; C8H18; [540-84-1]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail

Evaluator:
   G.T. Hefter, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, W.A., Australia. January 1986.

Critical Evaluation:

   Quantitative solubility data for the 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (1) – water (2) system have been reported in the publications listed in Table 1.

The original data in all of these publications are compiled in the Data Sheets immediately following this Critical Evaluation. For convenience further discussion of this system will be in two parts.


1. THE SOLUBILITY OF 2,2,4-TRIMETHYLPENTANE (1) IN WATER (2)

Very few data are available for the solubility of 2,2,4-trimethylpentane in water making critical evaluation difficult. The datum of Baker (ref 2) is rejected as the temperature was not specified. All other reported values are collected in Table 2 with the exception of the datum of Krzyzanowska and Szeliga (ref 8) which does not appear to be independent of that of Price (ref 7) and has therefore been excluded from consideration.

At 298K where comparisons are possible, the values of McAuliffe (ref 4) and Polak and Lu (ref 5) are in reasonable agreement. The value reported by Price (ref 7) is much lower. Although Price’s data for many hydrocarbons in water are normally reliable, many of his values for the higher hydrocarbons are lower than other studies. However, in the absence of confirmatory studies it is not reasonable to reject Price’s value at this stage. However, it has not been included in the calculation of the “Best” values at 298K..

At other temperatures the “Best” values should be regarded with the caution in the absence of confirmatory studies.


2. SOLUBILITY OF WATER (2) IN 2,2,4-TRIMETHYLPENTANE (1)

The various reported values of the solubility of water in 2,2,4-trimethylpentane are collected in Table 3 and plotted in Figure 1.

The data are generally in poor agreement and the averaged “Best” values must be regarded with caution pending further studies. Generally, for many other systems investigated by these authors, the data of Englin et al. (ref 3) are reliable at T < 300K but are too high at higher temperatures. Application of the van’t Hoff equation to the data of Englin et al. and Bergengeim (ref 1) gives values of ΔHs1n = 41.9 and 20.1 kJ mo1-1 and ΔCp,s1n =–100 and –1950 J K-1 mo1-1 respectively. Comparison of these data with other systems suggests that the values of Englin et al. are more realistic (although probably high at T > 300K). This system clearly warrants further investigation.



Experimental Data:   (Notes on the Nomenclature)

Table 1. Quantitative Solubility Studies of the 2, 2, 4-Trimethylpentane (1) - Water (2) System
AuthorT/KReferenceSolubilityMethod
Berkengeim273-3131(2) in (1)Karl Fischer
Bakerunspecified2(1) in (2)radiotracer
Englin et al.273-3233(2) in (1)analytical
McAuliffe2984(1) in (2)GLC
Polak and Lu273, 2985mutualGLC, Karl Fischer
Budantseva et al.2936mutualunspecified
Price2987(1) in (2)GLC
Krzyzanowska and Szeliga2988(1) in (2)GLC
Table 2. Tentative Values of the SOlubility of 2, 2, 4-Trimethylpentane (1) in Water (2)
T/KReferenceSol. PowerSolubilityBest Sol. PowerBest SolubilityBest Sol. Notex1 Powerx1x1 Note
273542.46 g(1)/100g sln42.5 g(1)/100g slna73.9a
293642 g(1)/100g sln42 g(1)/100g slna73a
2984, 5, 742.44, 2.05, 1.14 g(1)/100g sln42.2 ± 0.2 g(1)/100g slna,b73.5a,b
Table 3. Tentative Values of the Solubility of Water (2) in 2, 2, 4 - Trimethylpentane
T/KReferenceSol. PowerSolubilitySol. NoteBest Sol. PowerBest SolubilityBest Sol. Notex2 Powerx2x2 Note
2731, 3, 531.7*, 3.1, 2.3 g(2)/100g slnc32.4 ± 0.6 g(2)/100g slna41.5a
2831, 3, 533.7, 5.9, 4.5* g(2)/100g slnc34.7 ± 0.9 g(2)/100g slna42.9a
2931, 3, 5, 635.5, 11.5, 6.5*, 7.9 g(2)/100g slnc38 ± 2 g(2)/100g slna45a
2981, 3, 536.2*, 15.3*, 8.0 g(2)/100g slnc310 ± 4 g(2)/100g slna46a
3031, 337.0*, 20.1 g(2)/100g slnc320 g(2)/100g slna,b410a
313138.0 g(2)/100g slnc------
3233353.8 g(2)/100g slnc350 g(2)/100g slna,b430a
View Figure 1 for this Evaluation

Notes:
Table 2a  Obtained by averaging where appropriate; σn has no statistical significance.
Table 2b  Average of data from ref 4 and 5 only, see text.
Table 3a  Best values obtained by averaging where appropriate; σn has no statistical significance.
Table 3b  Order of magnitude values only, see text.
Table 3c  Values marked with an asterisk (*) have been obtained by the Evaluator by graphical interpolation of the authors' original data.

References: (Click a link to see its experimental data associated with the reference)

   1  Berkengeim, T.I., Zavod. Lab. 1941, 10, 592-4.
   2  Baker, E.G., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1960, 19, 309-17.
   3  Englin, B.A.; Plate, A.F.; Tugolukov, V.M. Pryanishnikova, M.A., Khim. Tekhnol. Topl. Masel 1965, 10, 42-6.
   4  McAuliffe, C., J. Phys. Chem. 1966, 70, 1267-75.
   5  Polak, J.; Lu, B.C.Y., Can. J. Chem. 1973, 51, 4018-23.
   6  Budantseva, L.S.; Lesteva, T.M.; Nemstov, M.S., Zh. Fiz. Khim. 1976, 50, 1344. Deposited doc. 1976, VINITI 437-76.
   7  Price, L.C., Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 1976, 60, 213-44.
   8  Krzyzanowska, T.; Szeliga, J., Nafta (Katowice) 1978, 12, 413-7.