IUPAC-NIST Solubility Database
NIST Standard Reference Database 106


Glass Ball as Bullet Solubility System: Carbon dioxide with Water

Components:
   (1) Carbon dioxide; CO2; [124-38-9]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
   (2) Water; H2O; [7732-18-5]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail

Evaluator:
   John J. Carroll and Alan E. Mather, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G6
October 1991, updated November 1994

Critical Evaluation:

   
The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Water at Low Pressure.

      Measurements of the solubility of carbon dioxide in water date back to at least the beginning of the nineteenth century. However, the first accurate measurements to appear are those of Bunsen (1). Since that time there have been over 75 investigations of the solubility of CO2 in water at low pressure.

      Carroll et al. (2) reviewed all the solubility data for CO2 in water for pressures below 1 MPa and for temperatures from 273 to 433 K (0 °C to 160 °C). They developed a model for calculating the solubility of CO2 in water over this range of pressure and temperature using a Henry's law approach.

      Most of the papers used in the review of Carroll et al. (2) are evaluated later in this volume. However, a few papers report values which Carroll et al. (2) concluded were accurate, but contain only one or two points. Thus, it was concluded that they did not warrant a thorough evaluation; however, they did deserve some mention. They are: Just (3), Christoff (4), von Hammel (5), Essery and Gane (6), Bartholome and Friz (7), Enders et al. (8), and Davies et al. (9).

     The model of Carroll et al. (2) was used to calculate the solubility of water when the CO2 -partial pressure was equal to 101.325 kPa (1 atm). That is, the product of the mole fraction of CO2 in vapor and the total pressure (y1x P) equals 101.325 kPa. These values are tabulated in Table 1 (next page)and plotted on Figure 1 . The values of the solubilities were then regressed to obtain the following correlation:

ln x1 = -32.5247 + 0.96017 τ + 68.0319/τ + 12.1522 ln τ                   (1)

where x1 is the mole fraction of carbon dioxide in the liquid at a partial pressure of 1 atm, and τ = T/100 where T is in K. This equation is valid for temperatures between 273 and 433 K (0 °C and 160 °C). The average absolute deviation between the model and Eq. (1) is 6x10-5 mo1 %. Values based on the correlation are also included in Table 1. From Table 1 and Fig. 1 it can be seen that the solubility, as defined here, becomes weak function of the temperatures for temperatures greater than about 373 K. In fact the solubility shows a shallow minimum at about 421 K.

     The solubilities calculated using the model of Carroll et al. (2) were then converted to Ostwald coefficients (volume of gas per unit volume of solvent, both at the specified temperature). For this conversion the density of carbon dioxide was calculated using the truncated virial equation. Second virial coefficients were taken from Angus et al. (10). The density of water was taken from The Steam Tables (11). The Ostwald coefficients are also listed in Table 1. The average difference between the Ostwald coefficients listed in Table 1 and those that would be obtained by assuming that CO2 is an ideal gas is 0.33% and the maximum error is 0.68 %.

     It is interesting to note that the minimum solubility, when expressed in Ostwald coefficients, occurs at about 408 K (0.300 cm 3 CO2 / 1 cm3 H2O). The difference in the location of the minima for the two solubility units is largely due to the fact that the density of water is a function of temperature.

     Using the procedure of Wilhelm et al. (12), the change in enthalpy, entropy and heat capacity for solution were derived from Eq. (1). These values are included in Table 1 as well. The minimum in the solubility noted above is the point where the calculated enthalpy change on solution is zero. The change in the sign of the enthalpy change on solution more clearly reveals the minimum solubility than the solubility values themselves. From Table 1 it can be seen that mole fraction solubilities at temperatures from 413 K to 428 K are 1.72x10-5 (to three significant figures) whereas the enthalpy change on solution clearly changes sign around 421 K. Finally, this approach predicts that the ΔCp is a linear function of temperature with (∂[ΔCp]/∂T = 0.08 kJ mo1-1 K-2.

     The effect of pressure on the solubility of CO2 is shown in Figure 2 . The curves on this figure were calculated using the model of Carroll et al. (2) . A few data points from the literature are plotted on this figure.

Experimental Data:   (Notes on the Nomenclature)

Table 1. The solubility of carbon dioxide in water (Pi = 101.325 kPa a) - Model (Ref.2)
T/KLcx1b (Model)x1b (Eq.)ΔH10 [kJ mol-1]ΔS10 [kJ mol-1 K-1]ΔCp,I0 [kJ mol-1 K-1]
273.151.6761.355 x 10-31.360 x 10-3-23.0-0.1390.145
278.151.4311.136 x 10-31.137 x 10-3-22.3-0.1370.145
283.151.2350.963 x 10-30.962 x 10-3-21.6-0.1340.146
288.151.0760.825 x 10-30.823 x 10-3-20.8-0.1310.147
293.150.9460.713 x 10-30.711 x 10-3-20.1-0.1290.148
298.150.8390.622 x 10-30.621 x 10-3-19.3-0.1260.149
303.150.7500.548 x 10-30.547 x 10-3-18.6-0.1240.149
308.150.6770.487 x 10-30.487 x 10-3-17.8-0.1210.150
313.150.6160.437 x 10-30.436 x 10-3-17.1-0.1190.151
318.150.5640.395 x 10-30.395 x 10-3-16.3-0.1170.152
323.150.5200.359 x 10-30.359 x 10-3-15.6-0.1140.153
328.150.4840.329 x 10-30.330 x 10-3-14.8-0.1120.153
333.150.4520.304 x 10-30.305 x 10-3-14.0-0.1100.154
338.150.4260.283 x 10-30.283 x 10-3-13.3-0.1070.155
343.150.4030.264 x 10-30.265 x 10-3-12.5-0.1050.156
348.150.3840.249 x 10-30.249 x 10-3-11.7-0.1030.157
353.150.3670.236 x 10-30.236 x 10-3-10.9-0.1000.157
358.150.3530.224 x 10-30.224 x 10-3-10.1-0.0980.158
363.150.4310.214 x 10-30.214 x 10-3-9.3-0.0960.159
368.150.3310.206 x 10-30.206 x 10-3-8.5-0.0940.160
373.150.3230.199 x 10-30.199 x 10-3-7.7-0.0920.161
378.150.3160.193 x 10-30.193 x 10-3-6.9-0.0900.161
383.150.3110.188 x 10-30.187 x 10-3-6.1-0.0870.162
388.150.3070.183 x 10-30.183 x 10-3-5.3-0.0850.163
393.150.3030.180 x 10-30.180 x 10-3-4.5-0.0830.164
398.150.3010.177 x 10-30.177 x 10-3-3.7-0.0810.165
403.150.3000.175 x 10-30.175 x 10-3-2.9-0.0790.165
408.150.3000.173 x 10-30.173 x 10-3-2.0-0.0770.166
413.150.3000.172 x 10-30.172 x 10-3-1.2-0.0750.167
418.150.3010.172 x 10-30.172 x 10-3-0.4-0.0730.168
423.150.3030.172 x 10-30.172 x 10-30.5-0.0710.169
428.150.3060.172 x 10-30.172 x 10-31.3-0.0690.169
433.150.3090.173 x 10-30.173 x 10-32.2-0.0670.170
View Figure 1 for this Evaluation

View Figure 2 for this Evaluation

Notes:
Table 1a  P1 = partial pressure of CO2
Table 1b  x1 = mole fraction of CO2
Table 1c  L = Ostwald coefficient [cm3 cm-3]

References: (Click a link to see its experimental data associated with the reference)

   1  Bunsen, R., Ann. Chem. Pharm. 1855, 93, 1.
   2  Carroll, J. J.; Slupsky, J. D.; Mather, A. E., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1991, 20, 1201
   3  Just, G. Z., Phys. Chem. 1901, 37, 342.
   4  Christoff, A., Z. Phys. Chem., Stoechiom. Verwandtschaftsl. 1906, 55, 622-34.
   5  von Hammel, A.Z., Phys. Chem. 1915, 90, 121.
   6  Essery, R.E.; Gane, J., J. Inst. Brewing 1952, 58, 129.
   7  Bartholomé, E.; Friz, H., Chem.-Ing.-Tech. 1956, 28, 706.
   8  Enders, C.; Kleber, W.; Paukner, E., Brauerei 1956, 9(1), 2 and 9(2), 50.
   9  Davies, G.A.; Ponter, A.B.; Craine, K., Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1967, 45, 372.
   10  Angus, S.; Armstrong, B.; de Reuck, K.M., Carbon Dioxide International Thermodynamic Tables of the Fluid State - 3, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1976; de Reuck, K.M., personal communication, 1991.
   11  Haar, L.; Gallagher, J.S.; Kell, G.S., NBS/NRC Steam Tables, Hemisphere Publishing Co., Washington DC, 1984.
   12  Wilhelm, E.; Battino, R.; Wilcock, R.J., Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 219.
   13  Bohr, C., Ann. Phys. Chem. 1899, 68, 500-25
   14  Morrison, T.J.; Billett, F., J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 3819-22.
   15  Versteeg, G.F.; van Swaaij, W.P.M., J. Chem. Eng. Data 1988, 33, 29-34.
   16  Findlay, A.; Creighton, H.J.M., J. Chem. Soc. 1910, 97, 536-61.
   17  Zel'venskii, Ya.D., Zh. Khim. Prom. 1937, 14, 1250-7.
   18  Zawisza, A.; Malesinska, B., J. Chem. Eng. Data 1981, 26, 388-91.
   19  Müller, G.; Bender, E.; Maurer, G., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 148-60.