IUPAC-NIST Solubility Database
NIST Standard Reference Database 106


Glass Ball as Bullet Solubility System: Methanol with Toluene and Water

Components:
   (1) Water; H2O; [7732-18-5]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
   (2) Methanol (methyl alcohol); CH4O; [67-56-1]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
   (3) Toluene (methylbenzene); C7H8; [108-88-3]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail

Evaluator:
   A. Skrzecz, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland (1997.03)

Critical Evaluation:

      A survey of reported compositions along the saturation curve (sat.), compositions of coexisting phases in equilibrium (eq.) and distribution of methanol between phases (distr.) for the system methanol-toluene-water is given in Table 10.

Saturation curve

   The system methanol-toluene-water forms a miscibility gap of type 1. Only one binary system, toluene-water, is partially miscible. Data for this system were compiled and critically evaluated in a previously published SDS volume.4 The recommended values of mutual solubility of toluene-water system at 298.2 K are: x'2 = 0.9972 and x"2 = 0.000104. This critical evaluation is based on the original papers with the exception of data of Leikola,2 which were taken from the handbook of Kafarov5; this data set was also taken into account during evaluation but is not reported as a compilation sheet because it does not contribute further to knowledge of the system. The end points of saturation curve3 were reported to be x2 = 0.999 and pure water which is inconsistent with recommended values but within the accuracy of experimental measurements (0.001 mole fraction) stated by the authors. The experimental saturation data reported in Refs. 1 and 3 at 298.2 K show similar behavior of the system with differences in the most difficult to measure region, close to the plait point. In this region, 0.15<x2<0.6, Mason and Washburn1 reported a slightly larger miscibility gap (about 0.04 mole fraction of water) than did Letcher and Siswana.3 Leikola,2 at 293.2 K, presents a smaller solubility gap than Ref. 1, but a little larger than Ref. 3. It seems, that results of Letcher and Siswana3 at 298 K are the most reasonable. Therefore only data of Ref. 3 presenting saturation and equilibrium data were used to derive the equation:

x1=1.0652+0.1260 ln(x2)–1.1183 x2+0.0591 x22.
The parameters were calculated by the least-squares method and the standard error of estimate was 0.0070. The equation is valid in the region of 0.02<x2<0.94. Selected points on the saturation curve, calculated by this equation together with the “best” values of Ref. 4 are presented in Table 11 and as solid line in Figure 5 . The water-rich branch of saturation curve contains only a small amount of toluene (x2<0.0001) and toluene was not detected in either study. These experimental points are not described by any model. The maximum methanol concentration observed on the saturation curve at 298 K was x1 = 0.68 ± 0.01.

Phases in equilibrium
   Compositions of coexisting phases in equilibrium of the ternary system methanol-toluene-water were reported only in Ref. 3. The tie lines are consistent with one another. They are considered tentative. Experimental tie lines together with all experimental saturation points at 298.2 K are presented in Figure 5 . The calculated plait point of the system at 293.2 K, Ref. 3, was x1 = 0.43 and x2 = 0.50.

Experimental Data:   (Notes on the Nomenclature)

TABLE 10. Summary of experimental data for the system methanol-toluene-water
AuthorT/KDataTypeReference
Mason and Washburn, 1937298sol. (13), distr. (7)1
Leikola, 1940293sol. (8)2
Letcher and Siswana, 1992298sol. (14), Eq. (6)3
TABLE 11. Calculated compositions along the saturation curve 298.2 K
T/KMole Fraction x1Mole Fraction x2
298.20.00000.000 104 Ref. 4
298.20.54990.020
298.20.61500.040
298.20.64380.060
298.20.65790.080
298.20.66380.100
298.20.66470.120
298.20.66210.140
298.20.65690.160
298.20.64980.180
298.20.64110.200
298.20.63130.220
298.20.62040.240
298.20.60870.260
298.20.59630.280
298.20.58330.300
298.20.56980.320
298.20.55590.340
298.20.54150.360
298.20.52690.380
298.20.51190.400
298.20.49660.420
298.20.48110.440
298.20.46540.460
298.20.44960.480
View Figure 1 for this Evaluation

Notes:
Table 10  Number of experimental points in parentheses.

References: (Click a link to see its experimental data associated with the reference)

   1  Mason, L.S.; Washburn, E.R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 59, 2076 (1937).
   2  Leikola, E., Suomen Kemistil B. 13, 13 (1940).
   3  Letcher, T.M.; Siswana, P.M., Fluid Phase Equilib. 74, 203 (1992).
   4  Shaw, D.G., ed., Solubility Data Series, Vol. 37, Hydrocarbons with Water and Seawater, Part I: Hydrocarbons C5 to C7 (Pergamon, New York, 1989).
   5  Kafarov, V.V., ed., Spravochnik po Rastvorimosti Vol. 2, Troinye, Mnogokomponentnye Sistemy, Kniga II (Izd. Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva, 1963).