IUPAC-NIST Solubility Database
NIST Standard Reference Database 106


Glass Ball as Bullet Solubility System: Acetonitrile with Carbon disulfide

Components:
   (1) Acetonitrile; C2H3N; [75-05-8]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail
   (2) Carbon disulfide; CS2; [75-15-0]  NIST Chemistry WebBook for detail

Evaluator:
   Valerii P. Sazonov, Technical University, Samara, Russia, August, 2001

Critical Evaluation:

           Solubilities in the system comprising acetonitrile and carbon disulfide have been reported in four publications.
        Poppe1 determined the upper critical solution temperature and the effect of pressure (0.58 to 9.8 MPa) by the synthetic method. Dorby2 determined the upper critical solution temperature. Mutual solubility of (1) and (2) was studied also by Govindaraian et al.3 between 320 and 323 K by the visual observation method. Sivaraman et al.4 between 319 and 324 K and between 0.1 and 4.05 MPa measured the mutual solubilities of (1) and (2) using the synthetic method and these data were reported in graphical form, numerical data were extracted from the published graphs for this evaluation.
        The upper critical solution temperature has been reported as 323.36 K3-4, 324.05 K1 and 324.2 K2. The data1-3 are in reasonable agreement and thus their average value: UCST = 323.7 ±0.4 K is recommended. The corresponding critical solution composition has been reported in as xcl = 0.4083 and xcl = 0.4094. These data give an average xcl = (0.408 ± 0.001), which is recommended.
        The value of dTc/dP was reported to be 0.0197 K·kPa-1 by Poppe1 and be 0.247 K·MPa-1 by Sivaraman et al.4
        All experimental values reported in Govindaraian et al.3 and Sivaraman et al.4 have been approximated by an equation based on the scaling law (described in the introduction to this volume) for which the following parameters have been derived:

a1 = 0.7194, a2= 1.5113, b1 = 10.9953, b2 = –6.4110

(mean standard error of estimate was 0.0115).

        For approximation xcl and UCST from data3,4 have been used. In the opinion of the evaluator, the mutual solubilities calculated by this equation may be treated as tentative. The results of calculations for the selected temperatures are presented in the following table. This relationship, together with experimental points reported in the data,3,4 are also presented in Fig. 3.
        Solubilities in the system comprising acetonitrile and carbon disulfide have been reported in four publications.
        Poppe1 determined the upper critical solution temperature and the effect of pressure (0.58 to 9.8 MPa) by the synthetic method. Dorby2 determined the upper critical solution temperature. Mutual solubility of (1) and (2) was studied also by Govindaraian et al.3 between 320 and 323 K by the visual observation method. Sivaraman et al.4 between 319 and 324 K and between 0.1 and 4.05 MPa measured the mutual solubilities of (1) and (2) using the synthetic method and these data were reported in graphical form, numerical data were extracted from the published graphs for this evaluation.
        The upper critical solution temperature has been reported as 323.36 K3-4, 324.05 K1 and 324.2 K2. The data1-3 are in reasonable agreement and thus their average value: UCST = 323.7 ±0.4 K is recommended. The corresponding critical solution composition has been reported in as xcl = 0.4083 and xcl = 0.4094. These data give an average xcl = (0.408 ± 0.001), which is recommended.
        The value of dTc/dP was reported to be 0.0197 K·kPa-1 by Poppe1 and be 0.247 K·MPa-1 by Sivaraman et al.4
        All experimental values reported in Govindaraian et al.3 and Sivaraman et al.4 have been approximated by an equation based on the scaling law (described in the introduction to this volume) for which the following parameters have been derived:

a1 = 0.7194, a2= 1.5113, b1 = 10.9953, b2 = -6.4110

(mean standard error of estimate was 0.0115).

        For approximation xcl and UCST from data3,4 have been used. In the opinion of the evaluator, the mutual solubilities calculated by this equation may be treated as tentative. The results of calculations for the selected temperatures are presented in the following table. This relationship, together with experimental points reported in the data,3,4 are also presented in Fig. 3.

Experimental Data:   (Notes on the Nomenclature)

Interpolated mutual solubility of acetonitrile and carbon disulfide
T/K102 * Mass Fraction w1Mole Fraction x1Comment(s)
318.211.20.189Carbon disulfide-rich phase
319.212.10.204Carbon disulfide-rich phase
320.213.30.222Carbon disulfide-rich phase
321.214.90.245Carbon disulfide-rich phase
322.217.20.278Carbon disulfide-rich phase
322.718.90.302Carbon disulfide-rich phase
322.819.40.308Carbon disulfide-rich phase
322.919.90.315Carbon disulfide-rich phase
323.020.50.323Carbon disulfide-rich phase
323.121.10.332Carbon disulfide-rich phase
323.222.10.345Carbon disulfide-rich phase
323.323.50.363Carbon disulfide-rich phase
318.250.70.656Acetonitrile-rich phase
319.2--Acetonitrile-rich phase
320.244.80.601Acetonitrile-rich phase
321.241.60.569Acetonitrile-rich phase
322.238.00.532Acetonitrile-rich phase
322.735.70.507Acetonitrile-rich phase
322.835.10.501Acetonitrile-rich phase
322.934.60.495Acetonitrile-rich phase
323.033.90.487Acetonitrile-rich phase
323.133.10.479Acetonitrile-rich phase
323.232.20.468Acetonitrile-rich phase
323.330.70.451Acetonitrile-rich phase
View Figure 3 for this Evaluation

References: (Click a link to see its experimental data associated with the reference)

   1  Poppe, G., Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 44, 640 (1935).
   2  Dorby, A., Makromol. Chem. 18/19, 317 (1956).
   3  Govindaraian, K.; Subramanyam, S.V.; Gopal, E.S.R., J. Chem. Phys. 56, 4235 (1972).
   4  Sivaraman, A.; Tiwari, M.K.; Jyothi, S.; Gopal, E.S.R., Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 84, 196 (1980).